The desired transform requires V2SI vector add support, the closest
we have is vect64 so check that which at least fixes the i?86 fail.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
2022-01-19 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
PR testsuite/102833
* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c: Require vect64.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c
index f8bfb4b8b1a..fc3ef42f51a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c
@@ -57,5 +57,6 @@ int main (void)
return 0;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimized: basic block" 1 "slp2" {
target vect_int_mult } } } */
-
+/* We need V2SI vector add support for the b[] vectorization, if we don't
+ have that we might only see the store vectorized and thus 2 subgraphs. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimized: basic block" 1 "slp2" {
target { vect_int_mult && vect64 } } } } */
--
2.31.1
