From: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>
The function aarch64_evpc_ins would reuse the target even though
it might be the same register as the two inputs.
Instead of checking to see if we can reuse the target, just use the
original input directly.
Committed as approved after bootstrapped and tested on
aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Note the testcases are not backported as __builtin_shufflevector
does not exist in GCC 11.
PR target/101529
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_ins): Don't use target
as an input, use original one.
(cherry picked from commit 52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230)
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index bbcf5ed4a61..b58a379759d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -23026,11 +23026,10 @@ aarch64_evpc_ins (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
}
gcc_assert (extractindex < nelt);
- emit_move_insn (d->target, insv);
insn_code icode = code_for_aarch64_simd_vec_copy_lane (mode);
expand_operand ops[5];
create_output_operand (&ops[0], d->target, mode);
- create_input_operand (&ops[1], d->target, mode);
+ create_input_operand (&ops[1], insv, mode);
create_integer_operand (&ops[2], 1 << idx);
create_input_operand (&ops[3], extractv, mode);
create_integer_operand (&ops[4], extractindex);
--
2.17.1
