Tested powerpc64le-linux, pushed to trunk.

The compiler warns about the loop in deque::_M_range_initialize because
it doesn't know that the number of nodes has already been correctly
sized to match the size of the input. Use __builtin_unreachable to tell
it that the loop will never be entered if the number of elements is
smaller than a single node.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        PR libstdc++/100516
        * include/bits/deque.tcc (_M_range_initialize<ForwardIterator>):
        Add __builtin_unreachable to loop.
        * testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc: New test.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc                |  3 +++
 .../testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc        | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc 
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc
index 80f1813bc76..03e0a505e14 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/deque.tcc
@@ -454,6 +454,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
                 __cur_node < this->_M_impl._M_finish._M_node;
                 ++__cur_node)
              {
+               if (__n < _S_buffer_size())
+                 __builtin_unreachable(); // See PR 100516
+
                _ForwardIterator __mid = __first;
                std::advance(__mid, _S_buffer_size());
                std::__uninitialized_copy_a(__first, __mid, *__cur_node,
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ef32ae10545
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/deque/100516.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// { dg-options "-O2 -Wstringop-overread" }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+// Bug 100516
+// Unexpected -Wstringop-overread in deque<char> initialization from empty
+// initializer_list
+
+#include <deque>
+
+void f()
+{
+    std::initializer_list<char> il{};
+    std::deque<char>{il};
+}
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to