On 2/2/22 12:57, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux.  Ok for
> releases/gcc-11?
> 
> 
> 
> s390_code_end () puts indirect branch tables into separate sections and
> tries to switch back to wherever it was in the beginning by calling
> switch_to_section (current_function_section ()).
> 
> First of all, this is unnecessary - the other backends don't do it.
> 
> Furthermore, at this time there is no current function, but if the
> last processed function was cold, in_cold_section_p remains set.  This
> causes targetm.asm_out.function_section () to call
> targetm.section_type_flags (), which in absence of current function
> decl classifies the section as SECTION_WRITE.  This causes a section
> type conflict with the existing SECTION_CODE.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * config/s390/s390.c (s390_code_end): Do not switch back to
>       code section.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * gcc.target/s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c: New test.

Ok. Thanks!

Andreas

> 
> (cherry picked from commit 8753b13a31c777cdab0265dae0b68534247908f7)
> ---
>  gcc/config/s390/s390.c                        |  1 -
>  .../s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c         | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c
> index 8895dd7cc76..2d2e6522eb4 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c
> @@ -16700,7 +16700,6 @@ s390_code_end (void)
>             assemble_name_raw (asm_out_file, label_start);
>             fputs ("-.\n", asm_out_file);
>           }
> -       switch_to_section (current_function_section ());
>       }
>      }
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..5d78bc99bb5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/nobp-section-type-conflict.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* Checks that we don't get error: section type conflict with ‘put_page’.  */
> +
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mindirect-branch=thunk-extern 
> -mfunction-return=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-table -O2" } */
> +
> +int a;
> +int b (void);
> +void c (int);
> +
> +static void
> +put_page (void)
> +{
> +  if (b ())
> +    c (a);
> +}
> +
> +__attribute__ ((__section__ (".init.text"), __cold__)) void
> +d (void)
> +{
> +  put_page ();
> +  put_page ();
> +}

Reply via email to