> Yes, I think the intent is clear. The question is whether we should
> re-instantiate the clear intent of preserving a literal / 0 as well
> (for C, without -fnon-call-exceptions).
Note that the code is precisely compiled with -fnon-call-exceptions:
ifeq ($(LIB2_DIVMOD_EXCEPTION_FLAGS),)
# Provide default flags for compiling divmod functions, if they haven't been
# set already by a target-specific Makefile fragment.
LIB2_DIVMOD_EXCEPTION_FLAGS := -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
endif
# Build LIB2_DIVMOD_FUNCS.
lib2-divmod-o = $(patsubst %,%$(objext),$(LIB2_DIVMOD_FUNCS))
$(lib2-divmod-o): %$(objext): $(srcdir)/libgcc2.c
$(gcc_compile) -DL$* -c $< \
$(LIB2_DIVMOD_EXCEPTION_FLAGS) $(vis_hide)
libgcc-objects += $(lib2-divmod-o)
ifeq ($(enable_shared),yes)
lib2-divmod-s-o = $(patsubst %,%_s$(objext),$(LIB2_DIVMOD_FUNCS))
$(lib2-divmod-s-o): %_s$(objext): $(srcdir)/libgcc2.c
$(gcc_s_compile) -DL$* -c $< \
$(LIB2_DIVMOD_EXCEPTION_FLAGS)
libgcc-s-objects += $(lib2-divmod-s-o)
endif
so it seems like we were about to reinvent the wheel here. ;-)
--
Eric Botcazou
