> In the past stack sharing has been quite important for the linux
> kernel.  So perhaps one of the tests we should do if we wanted to go
> forward in this cycle would be to test kernel builds to see if any start
> tripping over the stack space diagnostics they've put in place over the
> years.

Stack slot sharing is important generally speaking, not just for the kernel.
As demonstrated by the recent controversy about the 1/X optimization, last- 
minute broad changes made during stage #4 are generally not a good idea, and 
I'm not sure what the incentive for fixing PR middle-end/90348 now is (it's 
labeled a 9/10/11/12 regression).  At a minimum, I think that a switch to 
revert to the pre-12 behavior would be in order if the patch goes in now.

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Reply via email to