The polarity of do/do not was reversed for this option when compored to
the rest of them. This seems to have been copied from PowerPC, when the
polarity of the arguments in the docs was reversed (presumably to match
the default), but appears to have never made sense on RISC-V.
gcc/ChangeLog
* doc/invoke.texi (RISC-V -mstrict-align): Re-word the do/do not
language.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com>
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 0ebe538ccdc..5e8af05e359 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -27702,7 +27702,7 @@ integer load/stores only.
@item -mstrict-align
@itemx -mno-strict-align
@opindex mstrict-align
-Do not or do generate unaligned memory accesses. The default is set depending
+Do or do not generate unaligned memory accesses. The default is set depending
on whether the processor we are optimizing for supports fast unaligned access
or not.
--
2.34.1
