Hi,
  This patch removes TImode from mode iterator BOOL_128. Thus, bool operations 
(AND, IOR, XOR, NOT)
on TImode will be split to the relevant operations on word mode during expand 
(in optabs.c). Potential
optimizations can be implemented after the split. The former practice splits it 
after the reload
pass which is too later for some optimizations. The new test case illustrates 
it.

  Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no regressions. Is 
this okay for trunk?
Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.

ChangeLog
2022-02-08 Haochen Gui <guih...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/
        PR target/100694
        * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (BOOL_128): Remove TI.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR target/100694
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c: New.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c: New.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h: Remove.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c: Remove.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c: Remove.

patch.diff
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 6f74075f58d..2bc1b8f497a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -750,8 +750,7 @@ (define_mode_attr SI_CONVERT_FP [(SF "TARGET_FCFIDS")
                                 (DF "TARGET_FCFID")])

 ;; Mode iterator for logical operations on 128-bit types
-(define_mode_iterator BOOL_128         [TI
-                                        PTI
+(define_mode_iterator BOOL_128         [PTI
                                         (V16QI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
                                         (V8HI  "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
                                         (V4SI  "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b41d920140
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd\M} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mli\M} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mor\M} } } */
+
+/* It just needs two std.  */
+void foo (unsigned __int128* res, unsigned long long hi, unsigned long long lo)
+{
+   unsigned __int128 i = hi;
+   i <<= 64;
+   i |= lo;
+   *res = i;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7d6201cc5bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mnot\M} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd\M} 2 } } */
+
+/* All platforms should generate the same instructions: not;not;std;std.  */
+void bar (__int128_t *dst, __int128_t src)
+{
+  *dst =  ~src;
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 5a4a8bcab80..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-/* This test code is included into pr92398.p9-.c and pr92398.p9+.c.
-   The two files have the tests for the number of instructions generated for
-   P9- versus P9+.
-
-   store generates difference instructions as below:
-   P9+: mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv.
-   P8/P7/P6 LE: not;not;std;std.
-   P8 BE: mtvsrd;mtvsrd;xxpermdi;xxlnor;stxvd2x.
-   P7/P6 BE: std;std;addi;lxvd2x;xxlnor;stxvd2x.
-   P9+ and P9- LE are expected, P6/P7/P8 BE are unexpected.  */
-
-void
-bar (__int128_t *dst, __int128_t src)
-{
-  *dst =  ~src;
-}
-
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 72dd1d9a274..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 && has_arch_pwr9 } } } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrdd\M} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxxlnor\M} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxv\M} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mld\M} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mnot\M} } } */
-
-/* Source code for the test in pr92398.h */
-#include "pr92398.h"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c
deleted file mode 100644
index bd7fa98af51..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 && {! has_arch_pwr9} } } } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mnot\M} 2 { xfail be } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd\M} 2 { xfail { { {! has_arch_pwr9} 
&& has_arch_pwr8 } && be } } } } */
-
-/* Source code for the test in pr92398.h */
-#include "pr92398.h"
-

Reply via email to