On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc
> index c81344a20e4..25e5ce63b58 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc
> @@ -281,10 +281,13 @@ test07()
> std::pmr::unsynchronized_pool_resource upr(&cr);
> try
> {
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Walloc-size-larger-than="
> // Try to allocate a ridiculous size (and use a large extended alignment
> // so that careful_resource::do_allocate can distinguish this allocation
> // from any required for the pool resource's internal data structures):
> void* p = upr.allocate(std::size_t(-2), 1024);
> +#pragma GCC distinguish pop
Isn't it a bug that you (presumably) didn't get an error for
that misspelling? Or a diagnostic to distinguish it? 8-}
brgds, H-P
