> Am 04.03.2022 um 03:30 schrieb Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches 
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:29 AM liuhongt via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This is incremental patch based on [1], it enables optimization as below
>> 
>> -       vbroadcastss    .LC1(%rip), %xmm0
>> +       movl    $-45, %edx
>> +       vmovd   %edx, %xmm0
>> +       vpshufd $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
>> 
>> According to microbenchmark, it's faster than broadcast from memory

Is that true even on AMD uarchs?

>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/591162.html.
>> 
>> Bootstrapped and regtest on x86_64-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
>> Ok for trunk?
>> 
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>> 
>>        PR target/104704
>>        * config/i386/sse.md (*vec_dupv4si): Add alternative $r and
>>        corresponding post_reload splitter.
>> 
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 
>>        * gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c: Adjust testcase.
>>        * gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c: Ditto.
>>        * gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c: Ditto.
>> ---
>> gcc/config/i386/sse.md                      | 41 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c |  2 +-
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c |  2 +-
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c |  2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>> index 3066ea3734a..d124545aa5d 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>> @@ -25121,20 +25121,43 @@ (define_insn "vec_dupv4sf"
>>    (set_attr "mode" "V4SF")])
>> 
>> (define_insn "*vec_dupv4si"
>> -  [(set (match_operand:V4SI 0 "register_operand"     "=v,v,x")
>> +  [(set (match_operand:V4SI 0 "register_operand"     "=v,v,x,v")
>>        (vec_duplicate:V4SI
>> -         (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "Yv,m,0")))]
>> +         (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "Yv,m,0,$r")))]
>>   "TARGET_SSE"
>>   "@
>>    %vpshufd\t{$0, %1, %0|%0, %1, 0}
>>    vbroadcastss\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}
>> -   shufps\t{$0, %0, %0|%0, %0, 0}"
>> -  [(set_attr "isa" "sse2,avx,noavx")
>> -   (set_attr "type" "sselog1,ssemov,sselog1")
>> -   (set_attr "length_immediate" "1,0,1")
>> -   (set_attr "prefix_extra" "0,1,*")
>> -   (set_attr "prefix" "maybe_vex,maybe_evex,orig")
>> -   (set_attr "mode" "TI,V4SF,V4SF")])
>> +   shufps\t{$0, %0, %0|%0, %0, 0}
>> +   #"
>> +  [(set_attr "isa" "sse2,avx,noavx,noavx512vl")
>> +   (set_attr "type" "sselog1,ssemov,sselog1,sselog1")
>> +   (set_attr "length_immediate" "1,0,1,1")
>> +   (set_attr "prefix_extra" "0,1,*,0")
>> +   (set_attr "prefix" "maybe_vex,maybe_evex,orig,maybe_vex")
>> +   (set_attr "mode" "TI,V4SF,V4SF,TI")
>> +   (set (attr "preferred_for_speed")
>> +     (cond [(eq_attr "alternative" "3")
>> +             (symbol_ref "TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC")
>> +          ]
>> +          (symbol_ref "true")))])
>> +
>> +(define_split
>> +  [(set (match_operand:V4SI 0 "sse_reg_operand")
>> +       (vec_duplicate:V4SI
>> +         (match_operand:SI 1 "general_reg_operand")))]
>> +  "TARGET_SSE && reload_completed
>> +   /* Disable this splitter if avx512vl_vec_dup_gprv4si insn is
>> +      available, because then we can broadcast from GPRs directly.  */
>> +   && !TARGET_AVX512VL"
>> +  [(const_int 0)]
>> +{
>> +  emit_insn (gen_vec_setv4si_0 (gen_lowpart (V4SImode, operands[0]),
>> +                               CONST0_RTX (V4SImode),
>> +                               gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[1])));
>> +  emit_insn (gen_vec_duplicatev4si (operands[0], operands[0]));
>> +  DONE;
>> +})
>> 
>> (define_insn "*vec_dupv2di"
>>   [(set (match_operand:V2DI 0 "register_operand"     "=x,v,v,x")
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c
>> index 911b14d4a25..544a14db6f7 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8a.c
>> @@ -20,5 +20,5 @@ foo (void)
>>     array[i] = MK_CONST128_BROADCAST_SIGNED (-45);
>> }
>> 
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:vpbroadcastd|vpshufd)\[\\t 
>> \]+\[^\n\]*, %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:vpbroadcastd|vpshufd)\[\\t 
>> \]+\[^\n\]*, %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovdqa\[\\t \]%xmm\[0-9\]+, " 16 } } 
>> */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c
>> index 00682edb8c9..efee0488614 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-8c.c
>> @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
>> 
>> #include "pr100865-8a.c"
>> 
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpshufd\[\\t \]+\[^\n\]*, 
>> %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpshufd\[\\t \]+\[^\n\]*, 
>> %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovdqa\[\\t \]%xmm\[0-9\]+, " 16 } } 
>> */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c
>> index 8ffcdc1629d..e6f25902c1d 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr100865-9c.c
>> @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
>> 
>> #include "pr100865-9a.c"
>> 
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpshufd\[\\t \]+\[^\n\]*, 
>> %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpshufd\[\\t \]+\[^\n\]*, 
>> %xmm\[0-9\]+" 1 } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovdqa\[\\t \]%xmm\[0-9\]+, " 16 } } 
>> */
>> --
>> 2.18.1
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> BR,
> Hongtao

Reply via email to