Hi, Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590692.html
BR, Kewen on 2022/2/22 10:47 AM, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > As PR104024 shows, currently the option -mpower10-fusion isn't guarded > under -mcpu=power10, so compiler can optimize some patterns unexpectedly. > As the option is undocumented, this patch just simply unmasks it. > For some define_insns in fusion.md which have constraint v, they don't > have the correct conditions there, it can cause ICEs if the modes are > not supported there. Besides, it seems better to use BOOL_128 instead > of VM since the patterns are vector logical operations. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P8 and > powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and P10. > > Is it ok for trunk? > > BR, > Kewen > ----- > PR target/104024 > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/rs6000/fusion.md: Regenerate. > * config/rs6000/genfusion.pl: Add the check for define_insns > with constraint v, use BOOL_128 instead of VM. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr104024-1.c: New test. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr104024-2.c: New test.
