On 3/29/22 16:28, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 29.03.22 15:39, Tom de Vries wrote:
Any comments?
+(e.g.@: @samp{sm_35}). Valid architecture strings are @samp{sm_30},
+@samp{sm_35}, @samp{sm_53} @samp{sm_70}, @samp{sm_75} and
+@samp{sm_80}. The default target architecture is sm_30.
Missing comma (",") between sm_53 and sm_70.
Ack, fixed.
I want to note that the default is now back at sm_30;
for GCC 11 it was changed to sm_35, cf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html
I think changes are better described in release notes.
(We also need to update the wwwdocs release notes before the release,
but it
can also be done after branching).
Right, I'll follow up on your proposal from beginning of this month.
+@item -march-map=@var{architecture-string}
+@opindex march
+Select the closest available @option{-march=} value that is not more
+capable. For instance, for @option{-march-map=sm_50} select
+@option{-march=sm_35}, and for @option{-march-map=sm_53} select
+@option{-march=sm_53}.
(Somehow, I am not completely happy with the wording, but, admittedly, I
don't have a better suggestion.)
I feel the same, so committed as is.
Thanks,
- Tom
