Hi,

I did not backport my fix of PR 97456 to GCC 9 and it re-surfaced there
as PR 105071.  I have cherry-picked the fix, pasted below, on top of the
gcc 9 branch (the only change is an extra bug reference in the
ChangeLog) and made sure it passes bootstrap and testing on
x86_64-linux.  Can I commit the backport to the branch?

I think the old testcase is sufficient and so did not add the new one.

Thanks,

Martin




In PR 97456, IPA-SRA triggers a bug in tree-complex.c where it
converts:

 <bb 2>
   a$_M_value_21 = COMPLEX_EXPR <ISRA.18_10(D), ISRA.18_10(D)>;

(where ISRA.18 is IPA-SRA created PARM_DECL with DECL_IGNORED_P set,
which is why it only happens with IPA-SRA) into:

  <bb 2>
    a$_M_value_21 = COMPLEX_EXPR <a$_M_value$real_10(D), a$_M_value$real_10(D)>;

i.e. it replaces two uses of the parameter default-def with two
uninitialized default-defs of a new variable - all in hope to produce
code with better debug info.

This patch fixes it by avoiding the transform when the SSA_NAME to be
replaced is a default definition.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2020-10-19  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>

        PR tree-optimization/97456
        PR middle-end/105071
        * tree-complex.c (set_component_ssa_name): Do not replace ignored decl
        default definitions with new component vars.  Reorder if conditions.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-10-19  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>

        PR tree-optimization/97456
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 619f91eaa8c8a50f1f9d3e7b96ee837037f0e806)
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-complex.c                      |  3 +-
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5171c9b4577
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr97456.c
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fwhole-program" } */
+
+
+float val2 = 1.710780f;
+float val3;
+volatile float vf;
+
+int __attribute__((noipa))
+get_bool (void)
+{
+  return 1;
+}
+
+int __attribute__((noinline))
+wrong (float *pos)
+{
+  _Complex float a;
+
+  __real__ a = *pos;
+  __imag__ a = *pos;
+
+  _Complex float b = 0 + 0i;
+
+  b = b + a;
+
+  if (b == 0.0f)
+    return 1;
+
+  vf = __imag__ b;
+  return 0;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+  float val = get_bool () == 1 ? val2 : val3;
+
+  if ((wrong(&val), wrong(&val)))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-complex.c b/gcc/tree-complex.c
index d4b053d68e1..36a4d6f06d5 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-complex.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-complex.c
@@ -569,7 +569,8 @@ set_component_ssa_name (tree ssa_name, bool imag_p, tree 
value)
     {
       /* Replace an anonymous base value with the variable from cvc_lookup.
         This should result in better debug info.  */
-      if (SSA_NAME_VAR (ssa_name)
+      if (!SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (value)
+         && SSA_NAME_VAR (ssa_name)
          && (!SSA_NAME_VAR (value) || DECL_IGNORED_P (SSA_NAME_VAR (value)))
          && !DECL_IGNORED_P (SSA_NAME_VAR (ssa_name)))
        {
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to