On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:09:00PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> As PR103623 shows, it's a regression failure due to new built-in
> function framework, previously we guard __builtin_{un,}pack_{longdouble,
> ibm128} built-in functions under hard float, so they are unavailable
> with the given configuration. While with new bif infrastructure, it
> becomes available and gets ICE due to incomplete supports.
>
> Segher and Peter pointed out that we should make them available with
> soft float, I agree we can extend them to cover both soft and hard
> float. But considering it's stage 4 now and this regression is
> classified as P1, also the previous behavior requiring hard float
> aligns with what document [1] says, I guess it may be a good idea to
> fix it with the attached small patch to be consistent with the previous
> behavior. Then we can extend the functionality in upcoming stage 1.
Please answer the questions in
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-April/592922.html>?
Segher
