On 03/16/2012 12:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > For pointer arithmetics in the IL we assume the C > requirements, pointer arithmetics can be performed only within the same > object, so for > int a[10]; > both of the following are invalid, even in the IL: > int *p = a - 1; > int *q = a + 11;
Ok, so what's the solution? Add a second POINTER_PLUS_EXPR code with defined overflow behaviour, or add a flag to it? Bernd
