On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> IIUC this text is not true (maybe it was back in 2018?)

Initially I thought the way to transition to IEEE 128-bit long double would be
through multilibs, but we never installed multilibs for the different long
double types.  So yeah, the comment doesn't make sense these days.

> OK for trunk?
> 
> Which branches should it be on too, all of them?
> 
> -- >8 --
> 
> The choice of ieee or ibm long double format is orthogonal to multilibs,
> as the two sets of symbols co-exist and don't need a separate multilib.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * doc/install.texi (Configuration): Remove misleading text
>       around LE PowerPC Linux multilibs.
> ---
>  gcc/doc/install.texi | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> index 3192824bdc4..10bfceffceb 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> @@ -2139,17 +2139,6 @@ Until all of the libraries are converted to use IEEE 
> 128-bit floating
>  point, it is not recommended to use
>  @option{--with-long-double-format=ieee}.
> 
> -On little endian PowerPC Linux systems, if you explicitly set the
> -@code{long double} type, it will build multilibs to allow you to
> -select either @code{long double} format, unless you disable multilibs
> -with the @code{--disable-multilib} option.  At present,
> -@code{long double} multilibs are not built on big endian PowerPC Linux
> -systems.  If you are building multilibs, you will need to configure
> -the compiler using the @option{--with-system-zlib} option.
> -
> -If you do not set the @code{long double} type explicitly, no multilibs
> -will be generated.
> -
>  @item --enable-fdpic
>  On SH Linux systems, generate ELF FDPIC code.
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com

Reply via email to