On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > On 27/04/2022 15:03, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Richard Biener wrote: > > > >> The following makes sure to take into account prologue peeling > >> when trying to narrow down the maximum number of iterations > >> computed for the epilogue of a vectorized epilogue. > >> > >> Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > >> > >> I did not verify this solves the original aarch64 testcase yet > >> but it looks like a simpler fix and explains why I don't see > >> the issue on the 11 branch which does otherwise the same transforms. > > Can you verify the original aarch64 case is fixed and maybe add > > a testcase for that to gcc.target/aarch64? > > Your committed patch fixes the original testcase, but I'll stick to the > testcase you have as it's less fiddly, but I will add the options required to > make it originally fail for aarch64. > > Is the attached patch OK for trunk?
Yes. Thanks, Richard. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > PR tree-optimization/105219 > * testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr105219.c: Add aarch64 target option. > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
