Hi Martin,
>>> Subject: [PATCH] configure: add --disable-fix-includes
>>
>> As I've mentioned before, I believe, the command is called fixincludes
>> in current gcc docs, and the option should reflect that, not introduce a
>> name used nowhere else.
>
> No, I can't use it, because even with current master using
> --disable-fixincludes
> means the tool is not built at all. It results with:
>
> g++ -g -DIN_GCC -fPIC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
> -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
> -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -o
> build/genchecksum \
> build/genchecksum.o ../build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libiberty/pic/libiberty.a
> make: *** No rule to make target
> '../build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/fixincludes/fixinc.sh', needed by
> 'stmp-fixinc'. Stop.
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
and why not just fix that, rather than introducing yet another option?
This error suggests current --disable-fixincludes is useless on it's
own.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
