Hi all,

I just refined this patch with more explanation in commit message.

No code change compare to last change, which removed ix86_match_ccmode.

Ok for trunk?

BRs,
Haochen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiang, Haochen
> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2022 9:55 AM
> To: Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform
> pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 4:59 PM
> > To: Jiang, Haochen <haochen.ji...@intel.com>
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [i386]Add combine splitter to transform
> > pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.
> >
> > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:01 AM Haochen Jiang <haochen.ji...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This patch aims to add a combine splitter to transform
> pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.
> > >
> > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
> > >
> > > BRs,
> > > Haochen
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         PR target/104371
> > >         * config/i386/sse.md: Add new define_mode_attr and define_split.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         PR target/104371
> > >         * gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c: New test.
> > >         * gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c: Ditto.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/config/i386/sse.md                     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c
> > >  create mode 100755 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md index
> > > 7b791def542..71afda73c8f 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> > > @@ -20083,6 +20083,25 @@
> > >     (set_attr "prefix" "maybe_vex")
> > >     (set_attr "mode" "SI")])
> > >
> > > +;; Optimize pxor/pcmpeqb/pmovmskb/cmp 0xffff to ptest.
> > > +(define_mode_attr vi1avx2const
> > > +  [(V32QI "0xffffffff") (V16QI "0xffff")])
> > > +
> > > +(define_split
> > > +  [(set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG)
> > > +       (compare:CCZ (unspec:SI
> > > +                       [(eq:VI1_AVX2
> > > +                           (match_operand:VI1_AVX2 0 "vector_operand")
> > > +                           (match_operand:VI1_AVX2 1 "const0_operand"))]
> > > +                   UNSPEC_MOVMSK)
> > > +                (match_operand 2 "const_int_operand")))]
> > > +  "TARGET_SSE4_1 && ix86_match_ccmode (insn, CCmode)
> >
> > No need to use ix86_match_ccmode here, the pattern is already limited to
> > CCZmode,
> >
> > Uros.
> >
> 
> Removed this condition in my new patch, also make the testcase change
> according to
> Hongyu's review.
> 
> Is the patch Ok for trunk?
> 
> Haochen
> 
> > > +  && (INTVAL (operands[2]) == (int) (<vi1avx2const>))"
> > > +  [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)
> > > +       (unspec:CC [(match_dup 0)
> > > +                   (match_dup 0)]
> > > +                  UNSPEC_PTEST))])
> > > +
> > >  (define_expand "sse2_maskmovdqu"
> > >    [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "memory_operand")
> > >         (unspec:V16QI [(match_operand:V16QI 1 "register_operand") diff
> > > --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..df7c0b074e3
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-1.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse4" } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ptest\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pxor\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pcmpeqb\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pmovmskb\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +
> > > +#include <smmintrin.h>
> > > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > > +
> > > +bool is_zero(__m128i x)
> > > +{
> > > +  return _mm_movemask_epi8(_mm_cmpeq_epi8(x, _mm_setzero_si128()))
> > ==
> > > +0xffff; }
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000000..f0d0afd5897
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104371-2.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx2" } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "vptest\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vpxor\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vpcmpeqb\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "vpmovmskb\[ \\t\]" } } */
> > > +
> > > +#include <immintrin.h>
> > > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > > +
> > > +bool is_zero256(__m256i x)
> > > +{
> > > +  return _mm256_movemask_epi8(_mm256_cmpeq_epi8(x,
> > > +_mm256_setzero_si256())) == 0xffffffff; }
> > > --
> > > 2.18.1
> > >

Attachment: 0001-i386-Add-combine-splitter-to-transform-pxor-pcmpeqb-.patch
Description: 0001-i386-Add-combine-splitter-to-transform-pxor-pcmpeqb-.patch

Reply via email to