> It won't work for types larger than size of address, it would need to use > dwarf_OP (DW_OP_const_type) instead of DW_OP_lit0 in that case. > But maybe TRUTH_NOT_EXPR will be never seen for such types and after all, > even the loc_list_from_tree_1 INTEGER_CST case doesn't handle that > (the RTL case does). > So I think at least for now it is ok.
Thanks. Any objection to me installing it on the 12 branch as well? -- Eric Botcazou
