This typo was fixed a little while ago in binutils-gdb with commit e951225303. I noticed the difference today when importing libiberty from gcc. Committed as obvious.
include/ * dwarf2.def: Correct spelling of DW_AT_namelist_item. gcc/ * dwarf2out.cc (gen_namelist_decl): Adjust to suit correct spelling of DW_AT_namelist_item. diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc index fccf59e8ec3..29f32ec6939 100644 --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc @@ -27479,7 +27479,7 @@ gen_namelist_decl (tree name, dw_die_ref scope_die, tree item_decls) nml_item_ref_die = force_decl_die (value); nml_item_die = new_die (DW_TAG_namelist_item, nml_die, NULL); - add_AT_die_ref (nml_item_die, DW_AT_namelist_items, nml_item_ref_die); + add_AT_die_ref (nml_item_die, DW_AT_namelist_item, nml_item_ref_die); } return nml_die; } diff --git a/include/dwarf2.def b/include/dwarf2.def index 4214c80907a..530c6f849f9 100644 --- a/include/dwarf2.def +++ b/include/dwarf2.def @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ DW_AT (DW_AT_frame_base, 0x40) DW_AT (DW_AT_friend, 0x41) DW_AT (DW_AT_identifier_case, 0x42) DW_AT (DW_AT_macro_info, 0x43) -DW_AT (DW_AT_namelist_items, 0x44) +DW_AT (DW_AT_namelist_item, 0x44) DW_AT (DW_AT_priority, 0x45) DW_AT (DW_AT_segment, 0x46) DW_AT (DW_AT_specification, 0x47) -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM