This typo was fixed a little while ago in binutils-gdb with commit
e951225303.  I noticed the difference today when importing libiberty
from gcc.  Committed as obvious.

include/
        * dwarf2.def: Correct spelling of DW_AT_namelist_item.
gcc/
        * dwarf2out.cc (gen_namelist_decl): Adjust to suit correct
        spelling of DW_AT_namelist_item.

diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index fccf59e8ec3..29f32ec6939 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
@@ -27479,7 +27479,7 @@ gen_namelist_decl (tree name, dw_die_ref scope_die, 
tree item_decls)
        nml_item_ref_die = force_decl_die (value);
 
       nml_item_die = new_die (DW_TAG_namelist_item, nml_die, NULL);
-      add_AT_die_ref (nml_item_die, DW_AT_namelist_items, nml_item_ref_die);
+      add_AT_die_ref (nml_item_die, DW_AT_namelist_item, nml_item_ref_die);
     }
   return nml_die;
 }
diff --git a/include/dwarf2.def b/include/dwarf2.def
index 4214c80907a..530c6f849f9 100644
--- a/include/dwarf2.def
+++ b/include/dwarf2.def
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ DW_AT (DW_AT_frame_base, 0x40)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_friend, 0x41)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_identifier_case, 0x42)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_macro_info, 0x43)
-DW_AT (DW_AT_namelist_items, 0x44)
+DW_AT (DW_AT_namelist_item, 0x44)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_priority, 0x45)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_segment, 0x46)
 DW_AT (DW_AT_specification, 0x47)

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Reply via email to