The previous patch for 105852 avoids copying DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO from a
non-templated friend, but it really shouldn't have it in the first place.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.

        PR c++/105852

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * decl.cc (duplicate_decls): Change non-templated friend
        check to an assert.
        * pt.cc (tsubst_function_decl): Don't set DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO
        on non-templated friends.
        (tsubst_friend_function): Adjust.
---
 gcc/cp/decl.cc |  9 +++++----
 gcc/cp/pt.cc   | 14 ++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 3e869954ccb..7f3b3c3c588 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -2664,10 +2664,11 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl, bool 
hiding, bool was_hidden)
                  = TINFO_USED_TEMPLATE_ID (new_template_info);
            }
 
-         if (non_templated_friend_p (olddecl))
-           /* Don't copy tinfo from a non-templated friend (PR105761).  */;
-         else
-           DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (newdecl) = DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (olddecl);
+         /* We don't want to copy template info from a non-templated friend
+            (PR105761), but these shouldn't have DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO now.  */
+         gcc_checking_assert (!DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (olddecl)
+                              || !non_templated_friend_p (olddecl));
+         DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (newdecl) = DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (olddecl);
        }
 
       if (DECL_DECLARES_FUNCTION_P (newdecl))
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 9c1b026857e..3154186ac20 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -11298,9 +11298,10 @@ tsubst_friend_function (tree decl, tree args)
       tree new_friend_template_info = DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (new_friend);
       tree new_friend_result_template_info = NULL_TREE;
       bool new_friend_is_defn =
-       (DECL_INITIAL (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT
-                      (template_for_substitution (new_friend)))
-        != NULL_TREE);
+       (new_friend_template_info
+        && (DECL_INITIAL (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT
+                          (template_for_substitution (new_friend)))
+            != NULL_TREE));
       tree not_tmpl = new_friend;
 
       if (TREE_CODE (new_friend) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
@@ -14084,6 +14085,10 @@ tsubst_function_decl (tree t, tree args, 
tsubst_flags_t complain,
          && !LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (t))
        return t;
 
+      /* A non-templated friend doesn't get DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO.  */
+      if (non_templated_friend_p (t))
+       goto friend_case;
+
       /* Calculate the most general template of which R is a
         specialization.  */
       gen_tmpl = most_general_template (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (t));
@@ -14129,6 +14134,7 @@ tsubst_function_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain,
         tsubst_friend_function, and we want only to create a
         new decl (R) with appropriate types so that we can call
         determine_specialization.  */
+    friend_case:
       gen_tmpl = NULL_TREE;
       argvec = NULL_TREE;
     }
@@ -14324,7 +14330,7 @@ tsubst_function_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain,
       /* If this is an instantiation of a member template, clone it.
         If it isn't, that'll be handled by
         clone_constructors_and_destructors.  */
-      if (PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
+      if (gen_tmpl && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
        clone_cdtor (r, /*update_methods=*/false);
     }
   else if ((complain & tf_error) != 0

base-commit: 7d87790a871482e9c5142a8e885b4a5f76d197c8
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to