On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Iain Sandoe <develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:
> conceptually, the issue is that there are multiple sets of built-ins > (potentially, one set for each runtime, and the sets are of different > sizes). Thus, it's not just a case of turning these into regular built-ins, > without some mechanism to cater for overloading or presence/absence of > particular ones. I don't understand this. We're committed to one runtime per compilation, right? If so, then we should create only one of the sets at any time. Ciao! Steven
