On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 07:26, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> This feels more and more like a case for xfail until it gets fixed in
> the kernel, where atomic filesystem operations belong :-(
>
> Would a patch to add:
>
> // { dg-xfail-if "::rename is not POSIX-compliant" { target *-*-rtems* } }
>
> to rename.cc tests be acceptable? I'm afraid I can't go further down
> this rabbit hole, and my choices ATM seem to be limited to XFAIL
> patches, whether accepted by the GCC community or carried internally.
Yes, I think that's definitely the way to go.
