Hi.
This fixes the following bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095
It's the first time I work outside of the jit component, so please tell
me if I forgot anything.
Here are the results of running the test:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 182481
# of unexpected failures 91
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1475
# of unsupported tests 2535
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 231596
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 2083
# of unsupported tests 9948
=== jit Summary ===
# of expected passes 14542
# of unexpected failures 1
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 15538
# of expected failures 95
# of unsupported tests 653
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 5012
# of expected failures 33
# of unsupported tests 323
=== libitm Summary ===
# of expected passes 44
# of expected failures 3
# of unsupported tests 1
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes 54
It's the first time I run the whole testsuite, so I'm not sure if those
failures are normal. I got more unexpected failures for the gcc tests
than what is shown in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-
testresults/2022-June/764154.html. In any case, I get the same failures
when running the testsuite on master. Perhaps my configure command is
wrong? I used the following:
../../gcc/configure --enable-host-shared --enable-
languages=c,jit,c++,lto --enable-checking=release
--prefix=(pwd)/../install
Thanks for the review.
Antoni Boucher (1):
target: Fix asm generation for AVX builtins when using -masm=intel
[PR106095]
gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 10 ++---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106095.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106095.c
--
2.34.2
