On 6/29/22 13:42, Patrick Palka wrote:
In r13-1045-gcb7fd1ea85feea I assumed that substitution into generic
DECL_TI_ARGS corresponds to an identity mapping of the given arguments,
and hence its safe to always elide such substitution.  But this PR
demonstrates that such a substitution isn't always the identity mapping,
in particular when there's an ARGUMENT_PACK_SELECT argument, which gets
handled specially during substitution:

   * when substituting an APS into a template parameter, we strip the
     APS to its underlying argument;
   * and when substituting an APS into a pack expansion, we strip the
     APS to its underlying argument pack.

Ah, right.  For instance, in variadic96.C we have

    10  template < typename... T >
    11  struct derived
    12    : public base< T, derived< T... > >...

so when substituting into the base-specifier, we're approaching it from the outside in, so when we get to the inner T... we need some way to find the T pack again. It might be possible to remove the need for APS by substituting inner pack expansions before outer ones, which could improve worst-case complexity, but I don't know how relevant that is in real code; I imagine most inner pack expansions are as simple as this one.

In this testcase, when expanding the pack expansion pattern (idx + Ns)...
with Ns={0,1}, we specialize idx twice, first with Ns=APS<0,{0,1}> and
then Ns=APS<1,{0,1}>.  The DECL_TI_ARGS of idx are the generic template
arguments of the enclosing class template impl, so before r13-1045,
we'd substitute into its DECL_TI_ARGS which gave Ns={0,1} as desired.
But after r13-1045, we elide this substitution and end up attempting to
hash the original Ns argument, an APS, which ICEs.

So this patch partially reverts this part of r13-1045.  I considered
using preserve_args in this case instead, but that'd break the
static_assert in the testcase because preserve_args always strips APS to
its underlying argument, but here we want to strip it to its underlying
argument pack, so we'd incorrectly end up forming the specializations
impl<0>::idx and impl<1>::idx instead of impl<0,1>::idx.

Although we can't elide the substitution into DECL_TI_ARGS in light of
ARGUMENT_PACK_SELECT, it should still be safe to elide template argument
coercion in the case of a non-template decl, which this patch preserves.

It's unfortunate that we need to remove this optimization just because
it doesn't hold for one special tree code.  So this patch implements a
heuristic in tsubst_template_args to avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if
the substituted elements are identical to those of a level from ARGS.
It turns out that about 30% of all calls to tsubst_template_args benefit
from this optimization, and it reduces memory usage by about 1.5% for
e.g. stdc++.h (relative to r13-1045).  (This is the maybe_reuse stuff,
the rest of the changes to tsubst_template_args are just drive-by
cleanups.)

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?  Patch generated with -w to ignore noisy whitespace changes.

        PR c++/105956

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * pt.cc (tsubst_template_args): Move variable declarations
        closer to their first use.  Replace 'orig_t' with 'r'.  Rename
        'need_new' to 'const_subst_p'.  Heuristically detect if the
        substituted elements are identical to that of a level from
        'args' and avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if so.
        (tsubst_decl) <case TYPE_DECL, case VAR_DECL>: Revert
        r13-1045-gcb7fd1ea85feea change for avoiding substitution into
        DECL_TI_ARGS, but still avoid coercion in this case.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/pt.cc                             | 113 ++++++++++++++---------
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C |  14 +++
  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 8672da123f4..7898834faa6 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
       Fixed by: C++20 modules.  */
#include "config.h"
+#define INCLUDE_ALGORITHM // for std::equal
  #include "system.h"
  #include "coretypes.h"
  #include "cp-tree.h"
@@ -13544,17 +13545,22 @@ tsubst_argument_pack (tree orig_arg, tree args, 
tsubst_flags_t complain,
  tree
  tsubst_template_args (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, tree 
in_decl)
  {
-  tree orig_t = t;
-  int len, need_new = 0, i, expanded_len_adjust = 0, out;
-  tree *elts;
-
    if (t == error_mark_node)
      return error_mark_node;
- len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (t);
-  elts = XALLOCAVEC (tree, len);
+  const int len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (t);
+  tree *elts = XALLOCAVEC (tree, len);
+  int expanded_len_adjust = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+  /* True iff no element of T was changed by the substitution.  */
+  bool const_subst_p = true;
+
+  /* If MAYBE_REUSE is non-NULL, as an optimization we'll try to reuse and
+     return this TREE_VEC instead of allocating a new one if possible.  This
+     will either be ARGS or a level from ARGS.  */
+  tree maybe_reuse = NULL_TREE;
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
      {
        tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (t, i);
        tree new_arg;
@@ -13580,56 +13586,90 @@ tsubst_template_args (tree t, tree args, 
tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl)
        else if (ARGUMENT_PACK_P (orig_arg))
        new_arg = tsubst_argument_pack (orig_arg, args, complain, in_decl);
        else
+       {
          new_arg = tsubst_template_arg (orig_arg, args, complain, in_decl);
+ /* If T heuristically appears to be a set of generic template
+            arguments, set MAYBE_REUSE to the corresponding level from
+            ARGS.  */
+         if (maybe_reuse == NULL_TREE && orig_arg != NULL_TREE)
+           {
+             if (TEMPLATE_PARM_P (orig_arg))
+               {

This doesn't handle the case of variadic template parameters, which are represented in the generic args with a pack expansion. If this is a choice, there should be a comment about it.

+                 int level, index;
+                 template_parm_level_and_index (orig_arg, &level, &index);
+                 if (index == i && TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) >= level)
+                   maybe_reuse = TMPL_ARGS_LEVEL (args, level);
+                 else
+                   maybe_reuse = error_mark_node;
+               }
+             else
+               /* T is not a set of generic template arguments; use
+                  error_mark_node to denote this.  */
+               maybe_reuse = error_mark_node;
+           }
+       }
+
        if (new_arg == error_mark_node)
        return error_mark_node;
elts[i] = new_arg;
        if (new_arg != orig_arg)
-       need_new = 1;
+       const_subst_p = false;
      }
- if (!need_new)
+  if (const_subst_p)
      return t;
+ /* If ARGS and T are both multi-level, then substituted T may be
+     identical to ARGS (if each level was pairwise identical).  */
+  if (maybe_reuse == NULL_TREE
+      && TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (t)
+      && TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (args))
+    maybe_reuse = args;
+
+  /* Return MAYBE_REUSE and avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if the substituted
+     result is identical to it.  */
+  if (NON_ERROR (maybe_reuse) != NULL_TREE
+      && TREE_VEC_LENGTH (maybe_reuse) == len
+      && std::equal (elts, elts+len, TREE_VEC_BEGIN (maybe_reuse)))
+    return maybe_reuse;
+
    /* Make space for the expanded arguments coming from template
       argument packs.  */
-  t = make_tree_vec (len + expanded_len_adjust);
-  /* ORIG_T can contain TREE_VECs. That happens if ORIG_T contains the
+  tree r = make_tree_vec (len + expanded_len_adjust);
+  /* T can contain TREE_VECs. That happens if T contains the
       arguments for a member template.
-     In that case each TREE_VEC in ORIG_T represents a level of template
-     arguments, and ORIG_T won't carry any non defaulted argument count.
+     In that case each TREE_VEC in T represents a level of template
+     arguments, and T won't carry any non defaulted argument count.
       It will rather be the nested TREE_VECs that will carry one.
-     In other words, ORIG_T carries a non defaulted argument count only
+     In other words, T carries a non defaulted argument count only
       if it doesn't contain any nested TREE_VEC.  */
-  if (NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (orig_t))
+  if (NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t))
      {
-      int count = GET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (orig_t);
+      int count = GET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t);
        count += expanded_len_adjust;
-      SET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t, count);
+      SET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (r, count);
      }
-  for (i = 0, out = 0; i < len; i++)
+  for (int i = 0, out = 0; i < len; i++)
      {
-      tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (orig_t, i);
+      tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (t, i);
        if (orig_arg
          && (PACK_EXPANSION_P (orig_arg) || ARGUMENT_PACK_P (orig_arg))
            && TREE_CODE (elts[i]) == TREE_VEC)
          {
-          int idx;
-
            /* Now expand the template argument pack "in place".  */
-          for (idx = 0; idx < TREE_VEC_LENGTH (elts[i]); idx++, out++)
-            TREE_VEC_ELT (t, out) = TREE_VEC_ELT (elts[i], idx);
+         for (int idx = 0; idx < TREE_VEC_LENGTH (elts[i]); idx++, out++)
+           TREE_VEC_ELT (r, out) = TREE_VEC_ELT (elts[i], idx);
          }
        else
          {
-          TREE_VEC_ELT (t, out) = elts[i];
+         TREE_VEC_ELT (r, out) = elts[i];
            out++;
          }
      }
- return t;
+  return r;
  }
/* Substitute ARGS into one level PARMS of template parameters. */
@@ -14965,32 +15005,21 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain)
if (!spec)
              {
-               int args_depth = TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args);
-               int parms_depth = TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (DECL_TI_ARGS (t));
                tmpl = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (t);
                gen_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
-               if (args_depth == parms_depth
-                   && !PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
-                 /* The DECL_TI_ARGS in this case are the generic template
-                    arguments for the enclosing class template, so we can
-                    shortcut substitution (which would just be the identity
-                    mapping).  */
-                 argvec = args;
-               else
-                 {
                argvec = tsubst (DECL_TI_ARGS (t), args, complain, in_decl);
-                   /* Coerce the innermost arguments again if necessary.  If
-                      there's fewer levels of args than of parms, then the
-                      substitution could not have changed the innermost args
-                      (modulo level lowering).  */
-                   if (args_depth >= parms_depth && argvec != error_mark_node)
+               if (argvec != error_mark_node
+                   && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl)
+                   && TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) >= TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (argvec))
+                   /* We're fully specializing a template declaration, so
+                      we need to coerce the innermost arguments corresponding
+                      to the template.  */
                    argvec = (coerce_innermost_template_parms
                              (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARMS (gen_tmpl),
                               argvec, t, complain,
                               /*all*/true, /*defarg*/true));
                if (argvec == error_mark_node)
                  RETURN (error_mark_node);
-                 }
                hash = spec_hasher::hash (gen_tmpl, argvec);
                spec = retrieve_specialization (gen_tmpl, argvec, hash);
              }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3938e52e0e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/105956
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<int... Ns> struct list;
+
+template<int... Ns> struct impl {
+  static const int idx = 0;
+  using type = list<(idx + Ns)...>;
+
+  static constexpr const int* a[2] = {(Ns, &idx)...};
+  static_assert(a[0] == &idx && a[1] == &idx, "");
+};
+
+template struct impl<0, 1>;

Reply via email to