On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 8:36 PM Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi Uros, > Yes, I agree. I think it makes sense to have a single STV pass (after > combine and before reload). Let's hear what HJ thinks, but I'm > happy to investigate a follow-up patch that unifies the STV passes. > But it'll be easier to confirm there are no "code generation" changes > if those modifications are pushed independently of these ones. > Time to look into the (git) history of multiple STV passes...
OK, let's go forward with the proposed patch. Thanks, Uros.
