The following improves on the fix for PR105142 which restricted the
expression lookup used for maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd to
avoid picking up flow-sensitive info for use in places where guarding
conditions do not hold.  Instead of not allowing to expand SSA
definitions there the following temporarily clears flow-sensitive
info on the SSA names and restores it when finished matching.

Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.

        PR tree-optimization/105142
        * gimple-fold.cc (fosa_unwind): New global.
        (follow_outer_ssa_edges): When the SSA definition to follow
        is does not dominate fosa_bb, temporarily clear flow-sensitive
        info.
        (maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd): Set up unwind stack
        for follow_outer_ssa_edges and unwind flow-sensitive info
        clearing after matching.
---
 gcc/gimple-fold.cc | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
index a1704784bc9..876ef45434e 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
@@ -6886,6 +6886,7 @@ and_comparisons_1 (tree type, enum tree_code code1, tree 
op1a, tree op1b,
 }
 
 static basic_block fosa_bb;
+static vec<std::pair<tree, void *> > *fosa_unwind;
 static tree
 follow_outer_ssa_edges (tree val)
 {
@@ -6899,7 +6900,15 @@ follow_outer_ssa_edges (tree val)
              && (def_bb == fosa_bb
                  || dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, fosa_bb, def_bb))))
        return val;
-      return NULL_TREE;
+      /* If the definition does not dominate fosa_bb temporarily reset
+        flow-sensitive info.  */
+      if (val->ssa_name.info.range_info)
+       {
+         fosa_unwind->safe_push (std::make_pair
+                                   (val, val->ssa_name.info.range_info));
+         val->ssa_name.info.range_info = NULL;
+       }
+      return val;
     }
   return val;
 }
@@ -6958,9 +6967,14 @@ maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd (tree type, enum 
tree_code code,
                      type, gimple_assign_lhs (stmt1),
                      gimple_assign_lhs (stmt2));
   fosa_bb = outer_cond_bb;
+  auto_vec<std::pair<tree, void *>, 8> unwind_stack;
+  fosa_unwind = &unwind_stack;
   if (op.resimplify (NULL, (!outer_cond_bb
                            ? follow_all_ssa_edges : follow_outer_ssa_edges)))
     {
+      fosa_unwind = NULL;
+      for (auto p : unwind_stack)
+       p.first->ssa_name.info.range_info = p.second;
       if (gimple_simplified_result_is_gimple_val (&op))
        {
          tree res = op.ops[0];
@@ -6982,6 +6996,9 @@ maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd (tree type, enum 
tree_code code,
          return build2 ((enum tree_code)op.code, op.type, op0, op1);
        }
     }
+  fosa_unwind = NULL;
+  for (auto p : unwind_stack)
+    p.first->ssa_name.info.range_info = p.second;
 
   return NULL_TREE;
 }
-- 
2.35.3

Reply via email to