On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 06:48 +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > On 7/26/22 00:37, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 11:03 +0200, Martin Liska wrote: > > > Use expression that work fine for basic type. > > > > What's the motivation for this change? Surely the things being > > marked > > up are types, rather than expressions? > > Problem is that one can't reference a type that is not defined by a > :type: directive, > that's why I'm using :expr: > > Fixes the following Sphinx warnings: > > /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/jit/docs/topics/expressions.rst:70: > WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'long' > Invalid C declaration: Expected identifier in nested name, got > keyword: long [error at 4] > long > ----^
Fair enough, thanks. LGTM. Dave