On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 06:48 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 7/26/22 00:37, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 11:03 +0200, Martin Liska wrote:
> > > Use expression that work fine for basic type.
> > 
> > What's the motivation for this change?  Surely the things being
> > marked
> > up are types, rather than expressions?
> 
> Problem is that one can't reference a type that is not defined by a
> :type: directive,
> that's why I'm using :expr:
> 
> Fixes the following Sphinx warnings:
> 
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/jit/docs/topics/expressions.rst:70:
> WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'long'
> Invalid C declaration: Expected identifier in nested name, got
> keyword: long [error at 4]
>   long
>   ----^

Fair enough, thanks.  LGTM.

Dave

Reply via email to