On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > +/* Check if promoting general-dynamic TLS access model to local-dynamic is
> > + desirable for DECL. */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +optimize_dyn_tls_for_decl_p (const_tree decl)
> > +{
> > + if (optimize)
> > + return true;
>
> ...this. This is again an access to optimize which in LTO IPA phase is
> not really meaningful. Can the test be simply removed? If not (but
> please look at why), I'd suggest to test the overall optimize level only
> if there is a non-NULL cfun.
I'd prefer to keep it. This code is also called from the front-ends when
assigning initial TLS access model (during parsing, at the point where
visibility attributes, if present, have not been processed yet). There
we don't have IPA structures, but 'optimize' is set up.
I also want to avoid iterating over referring functions in non-LTO mode
where trusting 'optimize' should be fine during this IPA pass I think?
Alexander
