On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:39 schrieb Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz>: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This patch adds constructors of array_slice that are required to > >> create them from non-const (heap or auto) vectors or from GC vectors. > >> > >> The use of non-const array_slices is somewhat limited, as creating one > >> from const vec<some_type> still leads to array_slice<const some_type>, > >> so I eventually also only resorted to having read-only array_slices. > >> But I do need the constructor from the gc vector. > >> > >> Bootstrapped and tested along code that actually uses it on > >> x86_64-linux. OK for trunk? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> > >> gcc/ChangeLog: > >> > >> 2022-08-08 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> > >> > >> * vec.h (array_slice): Add constructors for non-const reference to > >> heap vector and pointers to heap vectors. > >> --- > >> gcc/vec.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/gcc/vec.h b/gcc/vec.h > >> index eed075addc9..b0477e1044c 100644 > >> --- a/gcc/vec.h > >> +++ b/gcc/vec.h > >> @@ -2264,6 +2264,18 @@ public: > >> array_slice (const vec<OtherT> &v) > >> : m_base (v.address ()), m_size (v.length ()) {} > >> > >> + template<typename OtherT> > >> + array_slice (vec<OtherT> &v) > >> + : m_base (v.address ()), m_size (v.length ()) {} > >> + > >> + template<typename OtherT> > >> + array_slice (const vec<OtherT, va_gc> *v) > >> + : m_base (v ? v->address () : nullptr), m_size (v ? v->length () : 0) > >> {} > >> + > >> + template<typename OtherT> > >> + array_slice (vec<OtherT, va_gc> *v) > >> + : m_base (v ? v->address () : nullptr), m_size (v ? v->length () : 0) > >> {} > >> + > > > > I don?t quite understand why the generic ctor doesn?t cover the GC case. > > It looks more like reference vs pointer? > > > > If you think that this should work: > > vec<tree, va_gc> *heh = cfun->local_decls; > array_slice<tree> arr_slice (*heh); > > then it does not: > > /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:6693:36: error: no matching > function for call to ?array_slice<tree_node*>::array_slice(vec<tree_node*, > va_gc>&)? > 6693 | array_slice<tree> arr_slice (*heh); > | ^ > In file included from /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/hash-table.h:248, > from /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/coretypes.h:486, > from /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:105: > /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/vec.h:2264:3: note: candidate: > ?template<class OtherT> array_slice<T>::array_slice(const vec<OtherT>&) [with > T = tree_node*]? > 2264 | array_slice (const vec<OtherT> &v) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/vec.h:2264:3: note: template argument > deduction/substitution failed: > /home/mjambor/gcc/mine/src/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:6693:36: note: mismatched types > ?va_heap? and ?va_gc? > 6693 | array_slice<tree> arr_slice (*heh); > | ^ > > [... I trimmed notes about all other candidates...] > > Or did you mean something else?
Hmm, so what if you change template<typename OtherT> array_slice (const vec<OtherT> &v) : m_base (v.address ()), m_size (v.length ()) {} to template<typename OtherT, typename l, typename a> array_slice (const vec<OtherT, l, a> &v) : m_base (v.address ()), m_size (v.length ()) {} instead? Thus allow any allocation / placement template arg? Richard. > Thanks, > > Martin > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)