On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 4:08 PM Kong, Lingling <lingling.k...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I fixed it in a new patch.  And added BF vector mode in SUBST_V and 
> avx512fmaskhalfmode for @vec_interleave_high<mode><mask_name>.
> Ok for trunk ?
Ok.
>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Handle E_V8BFmode in expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1 and
> > ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate.
> > > Ok for trunk?
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         PR target/106742
> > >         * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate):
> > >         Handle V8BF mode.
> > >         (expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1): Ditto.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c: New test.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc           | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc index 4b216308a18..a08222fe1b6 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> > > @@ -15030,11 +15030,15 @@ ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate (bool
> > mmx_ok, machine_mode mode,
> > >           dperm.op0 = dperm.op1 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
> > >           dperm.one_operand_p = true;
> > >
> > > -         if (mode == V8HFmode)
> > > +         if (mode == V8HFmode || mode == V8BFmode)
> > >             {
> > > -             tmp1 = force_reg (HFmode, val);
> > > +             rtx (*gen_vec_set_0) (rtx, rtx, rtx) = NULL;
> > > +             tmp1 = mode == V8HFmode ? force_reg (HFmode, val)
> > > +                                     : force_reg (BFmode, val);
> > tmp1 = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), val);
> > >               tmp2 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
> > > -             emit_insn (gen_vec_setv8hf_0 (tmp2, CONST0_RTX (mode), 
> > > tmp1));
> > > +             gen_vec_set_0 = mode == V8HFmode ? gen_vec_setv8hf_0
> > > +                                              : gen_vec_setv8bf_0;
> > add @ to vec_set<mode>_0 as (define_insn "@vec_set<mode>_0" and pass
> > mode to vec_set_0 as emit_insn (gen_vec_set_0 (mode, tmp2, CONST0_RTX
> > (mode), tmp1));
> > > +             emit_insn (gen_vec_set_0 (tmp2, CONST0_RTX (mode),
> > > + tmp1));
> >
> > >               tmp1 = gen_lowpart (mode, tmp2);
> > >             }
> > >           else
> > > @@ -21822,17 +21826,20 @@ expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1 (struct
> > expand_vec_perm_d *d)
> > >        return true;
> > >
> > >      case E_V8HFmode:
> > > +    case E_V8BFmode:
> > >        /* This can be implemented via interleave and pshufd.  */
> > >        if (d->testing_p)
> > >         return true;
> > >
> > >        if (elt >= nelt2)
> > >         {
> > > -         gen = gen_vec_interleave_highv8hf;
> > > +         gen = vmode == V8HFmode ? gen_vec_interleave_highv8hf
> > > +                                 : gen_vec_interleave_highv8bf;
> > Similar, add @ to define_insn and pass gen_vec_interleave.
> > >           elt -= nelt2;
> > >         }
> > >        else
> > > -       gen = gen_vec_interleave_lowv8hf;
> > > +       gen = vmode == V8HFmode ? gen_vec_interleave_lowv8hf
> > > +                               : gen_vec_interleave_lowv8bf;
> > >        nelt2 /= 2;
> > >
> > >        dest = gen_reg_rtx (vmode);
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..4a53cd49902
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106742.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-options " -msse2 -mno-avx2 -O1" } */ typedef __bf16 v8bf
> > > +__attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
> > > +
> > > +v8bf
> > > +vec_init_dup_v8bf (__bf16 a1)
> > > +{
> > > +  return __extension__ (v8bf) { a1, a1, a1, a1, a1, a1, a1, a1 }; }
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "punpcklwd" 1} } */
> > > --
> > > 2.18.2
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > BR,
> > Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

Reply via email to