Hi,

As PR96072 shows, the code adding REG_CFA_DEF_CFA reg note
makes one assumption that we have emitted one insn which
restores the frame pointer previously.  That part of code
was guarded with flag frame_pointer_needed before, it was
consistent, but later it was replaced with flag
frame_pointer_needed_indeed since commit r10-7981.  It
caused ICE due to unexpected NULL insn.  This patch is to
make the conditions consistent.

Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P7 and
powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and P10.

Is it ok for trunk?

BR,
Kewen
-----
        PR target/96072

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc (rs6000_emit_epilogue): Update the
        condition for adding REG_CFA_DEF_CFA reg note with
        frame_pointer_needed_indeed.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc          |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc 
b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
index 51f55d1d527..41daf6ee646 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
@@ -4956,7 +4956,7 @@ rs6000_emit_epilogue (enum epilogue_type epilogue_type)
         a REG_CFA_DEF_CFA note, but that's OK;  A duplicate is
         discarded by dwarf2cfi.cc/dwarf2out.cc, and in any case would
         be harmless if emitted.  */
-      if (frame_pointer_needed)
+      if (frame_pointer_needed_indeed)
        {
          insn = get_last_insn ();
          add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_DEF_CFA,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..23d1cc74ffd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr96072.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O1" } */
+
+/* Verify there is no ICE on 32 bit environment.  */
+
+void
+he (int jn)
+{
+  {
+    int bh[jn];
+    if (jn != 0)
+      goto wa;
+  }
+wa:;
+}
--
2.27.0

Reply via email to