On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 09:12:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 9/29/22 18:49, Marek Polacek wrote: > > When getting the name of an attribute, we ought to use > > get_attribute_name, which handles both [[ ]] and __attribute__(()) > > forms. Failure to do so may result in an ICE, like here. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? > > How do we print the attributes with this patch? Don't we also want to print > the namespace, and use [[]] in the output?
Good point, however: while the testcase indeed has an attribute in the [[]] form in the typedef, here we're printing its "aka": warning: initialization of 'FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck' {aka 'void (__attribute__((nocf_check)) *)(void)'} from incompatible pointer type 'FuncPointer' {aka 'void (*)(void)'} c-pretty-print.cc doesn't seem to know how to print an [[]] attribute. I could do that, but then we'd print aka 'void ([[nocf_check]] *)(void)' in the above, but that's invalid syntax! pp_c_attributes_display appears to be called for * and & only where you can't use an [[]] attribute. So perhaps we want to keep printing the GNU form here? I noticed that pp_c_attributes has never been used, so we can just remove it. I've also adjusted the test not to use "-w". Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- When getting the name of an attribute, we ought to use get_attribute_name, which handles both [[ ]] and __attribute__(()) forms. Failure to do so may result in an ICE, like here. pp_c_attributes has been unused since its introduction in r56273. PR c++/106937 gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c-pretty-print.cc (pp_c_attributes): Remove. (pp_c_attributes_display): Use get_attribute_name. * c-pretty-print.h (pp_c_attributes): Remove. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c: New test. --- gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc | 30 +++---------------------- gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.h | 1 - gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c | 13 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc index efa1768f4d6..2419e149333 100644 --- a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.cc @@ -850,32 +850,8 @@ c_pretty_printer::declaration (tree t) pp_c_init_declarator (this, t); } -/* Pretty-print ATTRIBUTES using GNU C extension syntax. */ - -void -pp_c_attributes (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree attributes) -{ - if (attributes == NULL_TREE) - return; - - pp_c_ws_string (pp, "__attribute__"); - pp_c_left_paren (pp); - pp_c_left_paren (pp); - for (; attributes != NULL_TREE; attributes = TREE_CHAIN (attributes)) - { - pp_tree_identifier (pp, TREE_PURPOSE (attributes)); - if (TREE_VALUE (attributes)) - pp_c_call_argument_list (pp, TREE_VALUE (attributes)); - - if (TREE_CHAIN (attributes)) - pp_separate_with (pp, ','); - } - pp_c_right_paren (pp); - pp_c_right_paren (pp); -} - /* Pretty-print ATTRIBUTES using GNU C extension syntax for attributes - marked to be displayed on disgnostic. */ + marked to be displayed on diagnostic. */ void pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) @@ -888,7 +864,7 @@ pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) for (; a != NULL_TREE; a = TREE_CHAIN (a)) { const struct attribute_spec *as; - as = lookup_attribute_spec (TREE_PURPOSE (a)); + as = lookup_attribute_spec (get_attribute_name (a)); if (!as || as->affects_type_identity == false) continue; if (c_dialect_cxx () @@ -906,7 +882,7 @@ pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *pp, tree a) { pp_separate_with (pp, ','); } - pp_tree_identifier (pp, TREE_PURPOSE (a)); + pp_tree_identifier (pp, get_attribute_name (a)); if (TREE_VALUE (a)) pp_c_call_argument_list (pp, TREE_VALUE (a)); } diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.h b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.h index be86bed4fee..92674ab4d06 100644 --- a/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.h +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-pretty-print.h @@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ void pp_c_space_for_pointer_operator (c_pretty_printer *, tree); /* Declarations. */ void pp_c_tree_decl_identifier (c_pretty_printer *, tree); void pp_c_function_definition (c_pretty_printer *, tree); -void pp_c_attributes (c_pretty_printer *, tree); void pp_c_attributes_display (c_pretty_printer *, tree); void pp_c_cv_qualifiers (c_pretty_printer *pp, int qualifiers, bool func_type); void pp_c_type_qualifier_list (c_pretty_printer *, tree); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..baad74cd86f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fcf-protection-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* PR c++/106937 */ +/* { dg-options "-fcf-protection" } */ + +[[gnu::nocf_check]] typedef void (*FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck)(void); +typedef void (*FuncPointer)(void); +[[gnu::nocf_check]] void testNoCfCheck(); +void testNoCfCheck(){}; +int i; +void testNoCfCheckImpl(double i) {} +void testNoCfCheckMismatch(FuncPointer f) { + FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck fNoCfCheck = f; /* { dg-warning "initialization" } */ + (*fNoCfCheck)(); +} base-commit: ade1e0d5896221500d1cbda38cd631cf80325aaa -- 2.37.3