On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:11 AM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:09 PM Iain Sandoe <idsan...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hongtao
> >
> > > On 17 Oct 2022, at 02:56, Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 9:30 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> > > <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 17 October 2022 03:02:22 CEST, Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
> > >>
> > >>>>>> Do you have this series as a branch somewhere that I can try on one 
> > >>>>>> of the
> > >>>>>> like affected platforms?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Not yet.
> > >>>>> Do we have any external place to put those patches so folks from the
> > >>>>> community can validate before it's committed, HJ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html#vendor
> > >>
> > >> Not sure where in cgit the user branches are visible, though? But they 
> > >> can certainly be cloned and worked with.
> > > Thanks for the reminder, I've pushed to remotes/vendors/ix86/ise046.
> > > * [new ref]                 refs/vendors/ix86/heads/ise046 ->
> > > vendors/ix86/ise046
> >
> > thanks for pushing this branch, much better to test these things before 
> > committing rather than a panic
> > to fix after…
> >
> >
> > with
> > f90df941532 (HEAD -> ise046, vendors/ix86/ise046) Add m_CORE_ATOM for atom 
> > cores
> >
> >  - on x86_64 Darwin19  I get the following bootstrap fail:
> >
> > In file included from 
> > /src-local/gcc-master/gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.cc:31:
> > /src-local/gcc-master/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h: In function ‘const 
> > char* get_intel_cpu(__processor_model*, __processor_model2*, unsigned 
> > int*)’:
> > /src-local/gcc-master/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:532:32: error: this 
> > statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
> >   532 |       cpu_model->__cpu_subtype = INTEL_COREI7_GRANITERAPIDS;
> >       |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /src-local/gcc-master/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:533:5: note: here
> >   533 |     case 0xb6:
> >       |     ^~~~
> > cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > ====
> > Will try to look later, if that does not immediately ring some bell.
> This should a bug, thanks!
I've updated the branch, please try that.
> > thanks
> > Iain
> >
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

Reply via email to