> Am 27.10.2022 um 09:10 schrieb Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com>: > > Hi, > > The test cases vect-bitfield-read-* requires vector shift > target support, they need one explicit vect_shift effective > target requirement checking. Besides, the vectype for struct > in test cases vect-bitfield-read-{2,4} is vector of long long, > we need to check effective target vect_long_long for them. > This patch can help to fix remaining vect-bitfield-* test > failures on powerpc. > > Tested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P7 and P8, as well as > powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and P10. > > Is it ok for trunk? Ok Thanks, Richard > BR, > Kewen > ----- > PR testsuite/107240 > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c: Add effective target checking > vect_shift. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c: Add effective target checking > vect_shift and replace vect_int with vect_long_long. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c: Likewise. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c | 1 + > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c | 3 ++- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c | 1 + > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c | 3 ++- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c | 1 + > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c | 1 + > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c | 1 + > 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c > index 01cf34fb444..42e50d9f0c8 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-1.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c > index 1a4a1579c14..a9aeefcd72c 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-2.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > -/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_long_long } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c > index 849f4a017e1..c7d0fd26bad 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-3.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c > index 5bc9c412e96..6a3ed8c0c6f 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-4.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > -/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_long_long } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c > index 1dc24d3eded..b2889df8a0a 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-5.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c > index 7d24c299758..2445f531be2 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-6.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c > index 3b505db2bd3..4b1ec8a6dab 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-read-7.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ > +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > #include <stdarg.h> > #include "tree-vect.h" > -- > 2.27.0
Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Adjust vect-bitfield-read-* with vect_shift and vect_long_long [PR107240]
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:26:47 -0700
- [PATCH] testsuite: Adjust vect-bitfield-rea... Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Adjust vect-bit... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches