Thank you very much for your example! I have sent a new patch according to your
guide.
"Jeff Law" <jeffreya...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On 11/17/22 02:53, Yixuan Chen wrote:
> > 2022-11-17 Yixuan Chen <chenyix...@iscas.ac.cn>
> >
> > * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c: Add compile option
> > "-msmall-data-limit=0" to avoid using .srodata section for riscv.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> > index 74fe2ae6626..628ddf1a761 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> > @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
> > sections.
> >
> > { dg-require-effective-target elf }
> > - { dg-do compile } */
> > + { dg-do compile }
> > + { dg-options "-msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
> >
> > const volatile int foo = 30;
> >
>
> Wouldn't this be better? It avoids a target specific conditional by
> instead extending what we look for to cover [s]rodata sections.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jeff
