In current riscv stack frame allocation, 2 steps are used. The first step 
allocates memories at least for callee saved GPRs and FPRs, and the second step 
allocates the rest if stack size is greater than signed 12-bit range. But it's 
observed in some cases, like gcc.target/riscv/stack_frame.c in my patch, callee 
saved FPRs fail to be included in the first step allocation, so we get 
generated instructions like this:

        li      t0,-16384
        addi    sp,sp,-48
        addi    t0,t0,752
        ...
        fsw     fs4,-4(sp) #issue here of accessing before allocation
        ...
        add     sp,sp,t0

"fsw    fs4,-4(sp)" has issue here of accessing stack before allocation. 
Although "add  sp,sp,t0" reserves later the memory for fs4, it exposes a risk 
when an interrupt comes in between "fsw  fs4,-4(sp)" and "add    sp,sp,t0", 
resulting in a corruption in the stack storing fs4 after interrupt context 
saving and a failure to get the correct value of fs4 later.

This patch fixes issue above, adapts testcases identified in regression tests, 
and add a new testcase for the change.

Fei Gao (1):
  RISC-V: fix stack access before allocation.

 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                     |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr93304.c      |  2 +-
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/spill-11.c      |  3 +--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_frame.c  | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/stack_frame.c

-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to