On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 1:19 AM Zopolis0 <creatorsmith...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was reverting a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0 as it removed code > for Java, but I may have misunderstood the change and made the incorrect > edits.
The change is fixing a bug (setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE from a CTOR in debug stmts) and fixes up the C++ frontend to properly mark things addressable when needed. I suspect the Java frontend will need something similar - when there's breakage without this reversion track down where what is complained on is produced in the Java frontend and properly mark things as TREE_ADDRESSABLE there. Richard. > On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 07:16, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:43 AM Zopolis0 via Gcc-patches >> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> > >> >> That's wrong and the comment you remove explains why.
