Lulu Cheng <chengl...@loongson.cn> writes: > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/rtl.texi: Correct a clerical error in the document. > --- > gcc/doc/rtl.texi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/rtl.texi b/gcc/doc/rtl.texi > index 43c9ee8bffe..44858d12892 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/rtl.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/rtl.texi > @@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ stores the lower 2 bytes of @var{y} in @var{x} and > discards the upper > (set @var{z} (subreg:SI (reg:HI @var{x}) 0)) > @end smallexample > > -would set the lower two bytes of @var{z} to @var{y} and set the upper > +would set the lower two bytes of @var{z} to @var{x} and set the upper > two bytes to an unknown value assuming @code{SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P} is > false.
Both versions are right in their way. I think the intention of the original was to show the effect of moving y to z via a paradoxical subreg on x. How about: would set the lower two bytes of @var{z} to @var{x} (which contains the lower two bytes of @var{y}) and set the upper ... OK with that change if you agree. Richard