On 12/27/22 19:23, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/13/22 01:55, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need a way to save registers on the stack and generate proper CFI for it. >> Since I do not intend to >> restore them I needed a way to tell the CFI generation step about it: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606128.html >> >> Is this ok for mainline? > Presumably there's validation bits that want to validate that everything > saved eventually gets restored? > > There's only one call to dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_restore, so ISTM that > providing an initializer for the argument isn't needed and just creates > an overload (and associated code) that isn't needed. Why not just > remove the default initializer? > > Ok with that change or a good reason why you need to keep the initializer.
Right. I'll remove it. Thanks for having a look! Bye, Andreas
