On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jan 18 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > Partly OT, what is riscv not defaulting that on as well?  Does it have
> > usable unwind info even without that option, something else?
> 
> The RISC-V ABI does not address this, AFAICS.

And neither do many other ABIs, still we default there to
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables because we've decided it is a good idea.

        Jakub

Reply via email to