On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jan 18 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Partly OT, what is riscv not defaulting that on as well? Does it have > > usable unwind info even without that option, something else? > > The RISC-V ABI does not address this, AFAICS.
And neither do many other ABIs, still we default there to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables because we've decided it is a good idea. Jakub