On Mon, 23 Jan 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:25:50AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:19:07PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > I was just trying to be careful, because unfortunately this spot
> > > > doesn't mean it really is only expanded in static var DECL_INITIAL,
> > > > it can make it into dynamic initializers, and most of DECL_VALUE_EXPRs
> > > > appear only in runtime code, otherwise we'd have much more of these 
> > > > issues.
> > > 
> > > But it shouldn't be harmful anywhere, right?
> > > 
> > > > But if you think it is ok, I'll test tonight a version just with
> > > > if (!data->genericize && DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (stmt)
> > > 
> > > OK with that change.
> > > 
> > > Though, actually, why not instead fix expand_expr_real_1 (and staticp) to
> > > look through DECL_VALUE_EXPR?
> > 
> > I'm afraid that is way too late.  GIMPLE optimizations don't try to
> > regimplify expressions they take from DECL_INITIAL of static vars, they
> > just unshare them and use them.  So, if this is to be done in the generic
> > code, it would need to be done by cgraph around the time when it gimplifies
> > function if there is any such point for variables.
> 
> I believe the right spot is record_reference, which is called through
> walk_tree from record_references_in_initializer which is called from
> varpool_node::analyze.
> 
> The new tests as well as g++.dg/init/pr53932.C pass with it, will do full
> bootstrap/regtest soon.
> 
> What do you think about this?

Guess it should work.  Do we (accidentially?) do anything special
to static var initializers in nested functions?  Can you think of
any other C/C++ construct that would have DECL_VALUE_EXPR in them?

Richard.

> 2023-01-23  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR c++/108474
>       * cgraphbuild.cc: Include gimplify.h.
>       (record_reference): Replace VAR_DECLs with DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P with
>       their corresponding DECL_VALUE_EXPR expressions after unsharing.
> 
>       * cp-gimplify.cc (cp_fold_r): Revert 2023-01-19 changes.
> 
>       * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp57.C: New test.
>       * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp58.C: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/cgraphbuild.cc.jj     2023-01-02 09:32:34.889104620 +0100
> +++ gcc/cgraphbuild.cc        2023-01-23 12:10:35.042067571 +0100
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
>  #include "gimple-walk.h"
>  #include "ipa-utils.h"
>  #include "except.h"
> +#include "gimplify.h"
>  
>  /* Context of record_reference.  */
>  struct record_reference_ctx
> @@ -79,6 +80,17 @@ record_reference (tree *tp, int *walk_su
>  
>        if (VAR_P (decl))
>       {
> +       /* Replace vars with their DECL_VALUE_EXPR if any.
> +          This is normally done during gimplification, but
> +          static var initializers are never gimplified.  */
> +       if (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (decl))
> +         {
> +           tree *p;
> +           for (p = tp; *p != decl; p = &TREE_OPERAND (*p, 0))
> +             ;
> +           *p = unshare_expr (DECL_VALUE_EXPR (decl));
> +           return record_reference (tp, walk_subtrees, data);
> +         }
>         varpool_node *vnode = varpool_node::get_create (decl);
>         ctx->varpool_node->create_reference (vnode, IPA_REF_ADDR);
>       }
> --- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc.jj  2023-01-23 11:47:49.889875804 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc     2023-01-23 11:49:01.227841759 +0100
> @@ -1010,16 +1010,6 @@ cp_fold_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtr
>       }
>        break;
>  
> -    case VAR_DECL:
> -      /* In initializers replace anon union artificial VAR_DECLs
> -      with their DECL_VALUE_EXPRs, as nothing will do it later.  */
> -      if (DECL_ANON_UNION_VAR_P (stmt) && !data->genericize)
> -     {
> -       *stmt_p = stmt = unshare_expr (DECL_VALUE_EXPR (stmt));
> -       break;
> -     }
> -      break;
> -
>      default:
>        break;
>      }
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp57.C.jj  2023-01-23 11:48:36.367202107 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp57.C     2023-01-23 11:48:36.367202107 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +// PR c++/108474
> +// { dg-do link { target c++17 } }
> +
> +struct T { int i, j; };
> +T h;
> +auto [i, j] = h;
> +int &r = i;
> +int s = i;
> +int *t = &i;
> +
> +void
> +foo (int **p, int *q)
> +{
> +  static int &u = i;
> +  static int v = i;
> +  static int *w = &i;
> +  int &x = i;
> +  int y = i;
> +  int *z = &i;
> +  *p = &i;
> +  *q = i;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp58.C.jj  2023-01-23 11:48:36.367202107 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp58.C     2023-01-23 11:48:36.367202107 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +// PR c++/108474
> +// { dg-do link { target c++17 } }
> +
> +namespace std {
> +  template <typename T> struct tuple_size;
> +  template <int, typename> struct tuple_element;
> +}
> +
> +struct A {
> +  int i;
> +  template <int I> int& get() { return i; }
> +};
> +
> +template <> struct std::tuple_size <A> { static const int value = 2; };
> +template <int I> struct std::tuple_element <I, A> { using type = int; };
> +
> +struct A a;
> +auto [i, j] = a;
> +int &r = i;
> +int s = i;
> +int *t = &i;
> +
> +void
> +foo (int **p, int *q)
> +{
> +  static int &u = i;
> +  static int v = i;
> +  static int *w = &i;
> +  int &x = i;
> +  int y = i;
> +  int *z = &i;
> +  *p = &i;
> +  *q = i;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +}
> 
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to