Jonathan (or some other libstdc++ developer), would you mind having a look at that section of https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html to see whether we should do further changes?
Thanks, Gerald Since ca314fbd2509439f708c56f34d0a85449a43fe73 in the gcc tree libstc++ no longer ships copies of files from the C++ committee homepage. Simplify instructions how to sync from upstream accordingly. --- htdocs/codingconventions.html | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/htdocs/codingconventions.html b/htdocs/codingconventions.html index 5519d3f9..af08f11a 100644 --- a/htdocs/codingconventions.html +++ b/htdocs/codingconventions.html @@ -756,8 +756,7 @@ first. </li> <li>libstdc++-v3: In docs/doxygen, comments in *.cfg.in are partially autogenerated from <a href="https://www.doxygen.nl";>the -Doxygen tool</a>. In docs/html, the ext/lwg-* files are copied from <a -href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/";>the C++ committee homepage</a>, +Doxygen tool</a>. In docs/html, the 27_io/binary_iostream_* files are copies of Usenet postings, and most of the files in 17_intro are either copied from elsewhere in GCC or the FSF website, or are autogenerated. These files should not be changed -- 2.39.1
