On 27/01/2023 17:44, Srinath Parvathaneni via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hello, I have committed a fix [1] into gcc trunk for a build issue mentioned in pr108505 and latter received few upstream comments proposing more robust fix for this issue. In this patch I'm addressing those comments and sending this as a followup patch. Regression tested on arm-none-eabi target and found no regressions. Ok for master?
OK. But please correct the syntax for the PR in the subject. It should be "[PR...]" not "(PR...)".
R.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610513.html Regards, Srinath. gcc/ChangeLog: 2023-01-27 Srinath Parvathaneni <srinath.parvathan...@arm.com> PR target/108505 * config.gcc (tm_mlib_file): Define new variable. ############### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply ############### diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc index 89f56047cfe3126bc6c8e90c8b4840dea13538f9..2aab92bbfd8b4088259ebf9b565af8e8bbef1122 100644 --- a/gcc/config.gcc +++ b/gcc/config.gcc @@ -4355,6 +4355,7 @@ case "${target}" in case ${arm_multilib} in aprofile|rmprofile) tmake_profile_file="arm/t-multilib" + tm_mlib_file="arm/arm-mlib.h" ;; @*) ml=`echo "X$arm_multilib" | sed '1s,^X@,,'` @@ -4393,7 +4394,7 @@ case "${target}" in # through to the multilib selector with_float="soft" tmake_file="${tmake_file} ${tmake_profile_file}" - tm_file="$tm_file arm/arm-mlib.h" + tm_file="$tm_file $tm_mlib_file" TM_MULTILIB_CONFIG="$with_multilib_list" fi fi
