In simple_dce_from_worklist, we were removing an inline-asm which had a vdef
(due to clobbering memory) but not unlinking the statement's vdef.
This fixes that oversight. This was a latent bug exposed recently
by both VRP and removal of stores to static starting to use
simple_dce_from_worklist.

OK for trunk (and for GCC 12 after a week)?
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

        PR tree-optimization/108684

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * tree-ssa-dce.cc (simple_dce_from_worklist):
        Call unlink_stmt_vdef on the statement before
        removing it.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c: New test.
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c: New test.

co-authored-by: Andrew Macleod  <amacl...@redhat.com>
---
 .../gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c     | 15 +++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc                              |  1 +
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9f02e44bd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/108684 */
+/* This used to ICE as when we remove the store to
+   `t`, we also would remove the inline-asm which
+   had a VDEF on it but we didn't update the
+   VUSE that was later on.  */
+static int t;
+
+int f (int *a)
+{
+  int t1;
+  asm (" " : "=X" (t1) : : "memory");
+  t = t1;
+  return *a;
+}
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a41b16e4bd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/dce-inline-asm-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/108684 */
+/* This used to ICE as when we removed the
+   __builtin_unreachable in VRP, as we
+   would also remove the branch and the
+   inline-asm. The inline-asm had a VDEF on it,
+   which we didn't update further along and
+   not have the VDEF on the return statement
+   updated.  */
+
+int f (int a)
+{
+  asm (" " : "=X" (a) : : "memory");
+  if (a)
+    return 0;
+  __builtin_unreachable();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
index b2fe9f4f55e..752785541e4 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
@@ -2140,6 +2140,7 @@ simple_dce_from_worklist (bitmap worklist)
        remove_phi_node (&gsi, true);
       else
        {
+         unlink_stmt_vdef (t);
          gsi_remove (&gsi, true);
          release_defs (t);
        }
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to