On 04/17/2012 03:33 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > Bernd, could you elaborate on the segfault you had seen? Perhaps we could > offer some advice on fixing it then.
It was only seen with another patch which modified the sched-rgn initialization code. > In the meanwhile, could you revert your patch? I'm sorry to point out this > problem after the patch had been committed, but it's not immediately obvious > :) > Andrey or I will add an explanatory comment in sel-sched afterwards. Will revert for now. In general I think it would be better to change sel-sched so that the init functions can always be called in the same order, so as to avoid unnecessary surprises. Bernd
