On 2/24/23 04:02, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> PS: I also removed a stray </code>, but admittedly only after the >> commit. I found it by manually running those through the w3 validator >> site. However, I did not see an automatic email, either it takes longer >> or does it no longer run? It did in the past! > > You are right, and this is a sore / sad point: validator.w3.org that we > used in the past now only supports interactive sessions. And they even > broke support for the Referer header, so I also had to remove the checking > link I had embedded in all of our pages. > > These days I invoke the validator (via a version of the original script) > when I see a commit. Which indeed leads to many orders of magnitude longer > delays. > > Sadly I don't have a better alternative. :-( > Could one of the following be used or used to generate a better workflow: https://html-validate.org/usage/cli.html - written in Javascript, but has a command line interface https://github.com/validator/validator - packaged, but a little cumbersome, may need a wrapper https://github.com/w3c-validators/w3c_validators - Wrapper written in Ruby, with a nice interface to validate a local file
Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP update for gcc-13/changes.html + projects/gomp/
Benson Muite via Gcc-patches Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:32:41 -0800
- [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP update for gcc-13/cha... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP update for g... Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP update f... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP upda... Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP ... Benson Muite via Gcc-patches
- Re: [wwwdocs, patch] Op... Benson Muite via Gcc-patches