On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:32:45PM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> --- a/gcc/vec.h
> +++ b/gcc/vec.h
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ public:
> T *bsearch (const void *key, int (*compar)(const void *, const void *));
> T *bsearch (const void *key,
> int (*compar)(const void *, const void *, void *), void *);
> - unsigned lower_bound (T, bool (*)(const T &, const T &)) const;
> + unsigned lower_bound (const T &, bool (*)(const T &, const T &)) const;
Missing space after (*) while you're there.
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ vec<T, A, vl_embed>::iterate (unsigned ix, T *ptr) const
> {
> if (ix < m_vecpfx.m_num)
> {
> - *ptr = m_vecdata[ix];
> + *ptr = address()[ix];
Missing space before ().
> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ inline void
> vec<T, A, vl_embed>::unordered_remove (unsigned ix)
> {
> gcc_checking_assert (ix < length ());
> - m_vecdata[ix] = m_vecdata[--m_vecpfx.m_num];
> + address ()[ix] = address ()[--m_vecpfx.m_num];
> }
As address () is used twice here, can't we stick it into a temporary
and use twice then?
> @@ -1249,8 +1249,11 @@ vec<T, A, vl_embed>::contains (const T &search) const
> {
> unsigned int len = length ();
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < len; i++)
> - if ((*this)[i] == search)
> - return true;
> + {
> + const T *slot = &address ()[i];
> + if (*slot == search)
> + return true;
Similarly, can't we do address () once before the loop into a temporary?
> template<typename T, typename A>
> unsigned
> -vec<T, A, vl_embed>::lower_bound (T obj, bool (*lessthan)(const T &, const T
> &))
> +vec<T, A, vl_embed>::lower_bound (const T &obj,
> + bool (*lessthan)(const T &, const T &))
) ( while you're at it.
Otherwise LGTM.
Jakub
