Committed as obvious.
-- >8 --
Reacting to a long-standing XPASS for CRIS.  This one is
slightly brown paper-bag level; it was never the here-removed
xfailed scan that failed and I didn't notice that XPASS when
reporting success on the commit as a whole.  It's not logical to
re-read what was just-written even with overlap issues, and I'm
sure that edit was originally a copy-pasto.  I checked
historical m68k-linux and pru-elf test-results too, to verify
that I got that part right.

        PR testsuite/91419
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c:15 Remove xfail for RHS.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c
index ecc50d355a7c..792541504903 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ void swap(struct s* p, struct t* q)
 
 /* The second statement is redundant.  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "x = " 1 "fre1" { xfail { ! 
natural_alignment_32 } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \[^;\]*x;" 1 "fre1" { xfail { ! 
natural_alignment_32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \[^;\]*x;" 1 "fre1" } } */
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to